Thomas Rieser
tireless in his 16 years of use had to> Alpine Man, "starred in Paul McCarthy's Installation> The Garden \u0026lt;*, many times to be repaired. The constant activity of the (as he is known)> Tree Fuckers \u0026lt;, had both the technique fail, as drop off the limbs. McCarthy had used the discarded> Fuckers \u0026lt;you further: an art piece, the 'Old Fuckers Senior Home \u0026lt;he had in mind in which all the old service> Alpine Men a retirement home \u0026lt;were found. The owner of the installation could develop this idea, however, no pleasure, he wanted to keep the original> McCarthy \u0026lt;. The will of the collector was, and the artist had no power over his 'McCarthy'.
The 'Old Fuckers Senior Home \u0026lt;was never built.
What is original in a work of art? Original is the created, or the creation? The anecdote of> The Garden 'shows two horizons. The definition of the "Originals \u0026lt;is impossible, as they are the perspective of the person who argues based. If the essence of the original in this sense is variable, then what ignites the aesthetic experience? Is there a foundation to which it relates? is in my horizon of aesthetic experience on the basis of the potential. The opportunity or ability to recognize an opportunity and experience then leads to an experience that is aesthetic. The work of art> The Garden \u0026lt;ceased to be art in which forbade the owner of the artist to continue it at the moment. The 'Alpine Man' is a sad> Fucker ', the' Senior Home \u0026lt;he would grow old with dignity allowed. The aesthetic experience lies in the potential of the anecdote, not in the current art.
* Paul McCarthy, The Garden. 1992nd Installation, Collection Jeffrey Deitch,
New York, NY. 
0 comments:
Post a Comment